<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: English Spelling &#8211; Apostrophe + S, after S</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.engvid.com/english-spelling-apostrophe-s-after-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.engvid.com/english-spelling-apostrophe-s-after-s/</link>
	<description>engVid brings you free English video lessons every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:23:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: engVid</title>
		<link>http://www.engvid.com/english-spelling-apostrophe-s-after-s/#comment-12263</link>
		<dc:creator>engVid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engvid.com/?p=131#comment-12263</guid>
		<description>This is a very rare and particular case, but first we need to make &quot;James&quot; plural -- to show that there is more than one James family or saint. So it would become Jameses (pronounced the same as &quot;James&#039;s&quot;). Then if we are talking about possession with the multiple Jameses, it will become Jameses&#039;s or Jameses&#039;. In this case, the first option is quite difficult to pronounce, so we might use the second. In thirty years of speaking English, I have never run into this, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very rare and particular case, but first we need to make &#8220;James&#8221; plural &#8212; to show that there is more than one James family or saint. So it would become Jameses (pronounced the same as &#8220;James&#8217;s&#8221;). Then if we are talking about possession with the multiple Jameses, it will become Jameses&#8217;s or Jameses&#8217;. In this case, the first option is quite difficult to pronounce, so we might use the second. In thirty years of speaking English, I have never run into this, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engVid</title>
		<link>http://www.engvid.com/english-spelling-apostrophe-s-after-s/#comment-12262</link>
		<dc:creator>engVid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engvid.com/?p=131#comment-12262</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right, you got it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, you got it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman</title>
		<link>http://www.engvid.com/english-spelling-apostrophe-s-after-s/#comment-12253</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engvid.com/?p=131#comment-12253</guid>
		<description>What happens when there are more than one James?

Say for arguments sake St James&#039;s park was dedicated to two St James&#039;s - how do you get that accross?
How will the reader know that the park is possed by two?

Another example (more likely to occur) would be when you say &#039;The James&#039;s household&#039; - how does that work when you want the reader to know that the household is the home of more than one person with the surname James?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when there are more than one James?</p>
<p>Say for arguments sake St James&#8217;s park was dedicated to two St James&#8217;s &#8211; how do you get that accross?<br />
How will the reader know that the park is possed by two?</p>
<p>Another example (more likely to occur) would be when you say &#8216;The James&#8217;s household&#8217; &#8211; how does that work when you want the reader to know that the household is the home of more than one person with the surname James?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam arif</title>
		<link>http://www.engvid.com/english-spelling-apostrophe-s-after-s/#comment-11117</link>
		<dc:creator>adam arif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engvid.com/?p=131#comment-11117</guid>
		<description>thanks james!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks james!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obey</title>
		<link>http://www.engvid.com/english-spelling-apostrophe-s-after-s/#comment-10728</link>
		<dc:creator>Obey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 04:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engvid.com/?p=131#comment-10728</guid>
		<description>Both of them are correct, as james explained in the lesson. 
The first case is usual case.
In the second case we take of the &#039;s&#039; because the pronunciation is difficult. If you use this form, you must use it through out of the whole document, otherwise, it becomes confusing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both of them are correct, as james explained in the lesson.<br />
The first case is usual case.<br />
In the second case we take of the &#8216;s&#8217; because the pronunciation is difficult. If you use this form, you must use it through out of the whole document, otherwise, it becomes confusing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOSE10</title>
		<link>http://www.engvid.com/english-spelling-apostrophe-s-after-s/#comment-8172</link>
		<dc:creator>JOSE10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 18:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engvid.com/?p=131#comment-8172</guid>
		<description>HEY, YOU ARE VERY GOOD ON ALL TOPIC THAT TEACH.
NOW I ASK THE QUESTION: HOW I CAN HANDLE PRONUNCIATION, THIS IS MY MAYOR PROBLEM; IF YOU CAN PLEASE HELP ME.
THANK YOU
JOSE10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HEY, YOU ARE VERY GOOD ON ALL TOPIC THAT TEACH.<br />
NOW I ASK THE QUESTION: HOW I CAN HANDLE PRONUNCIATION, THIS IS MY MAYOR PROBLEM; IF YOU CAN PLEASE HELP ME.<br />
THANK YOU<br />
JOSE10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ittp</title>
		<link>http://www.engvid.com/english-spelling-apostrophe-s-after-s/#comment-3504</link>
		<dc:creator>ittp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engvid.com/?p=131#comment-3504</guid>
		<description>the second is correct</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the second is correct</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fj~</title>
		<link>http://www.engvid.com/english-spelling-apostrophe-s-after-s/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator>Fj~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engvid.com/?p=131#comment-1628</guid>
		<description>amm confusin&#039; I guess the first statement is the right one:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amm confusin&#8217; I guess the first statement is the right one:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reinoni</title>
		<link>http://www.engvid.com/english-spelling-apostrophe-s-after-s/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Reinoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engvid.com/?p=131#comment-727</guid>
		<description>Hi James
Nice class!
Weel, i got stuck sometimes to use (&#039;s and s&#039;). Could you check for me, if this sentences are rights ?
&quot;The dog of Chris ate the food.&quot;

Which one is correct ?
1 - Chris&#039;s dog ate the food.
2 - Chris&#039; dog ate the food

If you can send me an answers, i&#039;ll be glad.
Rey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James<br />
Nice class!<br />
Weel, i got stuck sometimes to use (&#8216;s and s&#8217;). Could you check for me, if this sentences are rights ?<br />
&#8220;The dog of Chris ate the food.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which one is correct ?<br />
1 &#8211; Chris&#8217;s dog ate the food.<br />
2 &#8211; Chris&#8217; dog ate the food</p>
<p>If you can send me an answers, i&#8217;ll be glad.<br />
Rey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
